Home

Book Club
Career/Education
Environment
General
Melbourne
Places
Planning
Tales of the City
Urban Design

Login

Business and the Ethics of Education.
Salacious Sam

Given the current state of the tertiary education in Australia, one could be forgiven if they assumed that the learning that occurs in our tertiary institutions has no ethical component. Today's topic is on work placement, business and the ethics surrounding both.

Currently all 3rd year RMIT Planning Students are, or will commence job placement as part of the course in a variety of settings ranging from Local Government to private practice. The process of job allocation is set up to closely mirror the 'real world' in that students must apply in writing to several employers in the hope of gaining an interview. However, the process is inherently flawed from the outset. The overall process is as follows:

1-Work Experience Office at RMIT places 1st round placements up for students to look at around mid November (placement commences the following Feb).
2-Students are then allowed a maximum of 5 preferred organizations. These must be ranked in order with an accompanying ‘why I want to work here’ note.
3-The Work Placement Office then allocates 2-3 organizations to each student. Allocation is based on GPA with students ‘competing’ against each other. Already the simulated market is taking shape.
4-Once students receive their 2-3 options for placement, it is then expected that they will contact each of these organizations to request an interview. CVs are attached to cover letters and then the hopeful applicants must wait.

It is at this stage that the students leave the supposed safe environment of the university and take their chances in the real world of the job market.

5-Students now wait for each organization to contact them and schedule an interview. Depending on which organization students are engaged with, some will receive calls within a matter of weeks while some must wait until after the Christmas break.
6-Interviews are held, with generally 2-4 students ‘competing’ against each other for a single placement. Students are now judged on personal character, experience and presentation, rather than just on grades alone.
7-The process following these interviews is the standard process any employer would follow. After a successful interview, a student will be contacted and will (on most occasions) accept the offer of the placement.

Now there are, as I have been told repeatedly, many students who don’t get accepted to a placement in the 1st round. These poor unfortunates must then go through the same process in the 2nd round of offers that generally appear after the new year.

Students are urged to take the first placement they are offered, with the fair understanding that all students have been through the nominated process of writing cover letters, attending interviews and the like. Additionally, students are told not to seek other avenues of work outside the prescribed RMIT method.

As it stands, the system is flawed and deserving students are missing out because other students see it fit to muscle their way into placements that they do not deserve.

Planning 16th February, 2005 23:23:03   [#] 

Comments

hmmm
And then there are people like me who manage to get a planning job not because of connections but simply on a mixture of good luck and other marketable skills, who were 'inelligible' for work placement due to a lack of credit points.

As with having to complete Origins & Developments of Planning after failing Sustainable City Planning, I seem to feel that the more I fail stuff and the more I fall behind, the better off I will be compared with my 3rd year classmates - due to the continual changes being made to this program. By the time I get to doing work placement they may even change their minds about letting us organise our own placements.
Aaron Hewett  19th February, 2005 12:31:56  

By the book
I think the main problem with attempting to organise your own placement is the issue of insurance. I know of a few other people who have been able to organise their own planning related jobs but have been subsequently told that they have to go through RMIT's process.

Personally using the insurance argument is a weak excuse. Employers are aware of insurance, RMIT just wants to have control over placements. Yes, I think I'll do my placement in BENDIGO! Bravo RMIT for giving up so many options.

By the way, Salacious Sam, who are you?
Tom Anderson  19th February, 2005 12:44:35  

Insurance
It is a weak argument... considering that even though you're doing work placement - you're still EMPLOYED by these agencies - therefore you should be covered by workcover. Am I right?
Aaron Hewett  19th February, 2005 12:52:29  


Archive

April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003

Recent Comments

The Gastronomic Pub Crawl
      Russ, Andrew
Monday Melbourne: CCLIV,
      Andrew
Monday Melbourne: CCXXXII
      Russ, Andrew
Monday Melbourne: CCXXXII
      Russ, Andrew
Monday Melbourne: CCVI, M
      Russ, Stephie
Women and cycling
      Nick Peterson

Melbourne

Scribbling on Bricks
Melbourne 2030 Portal
Melbourne on Transit
Save Our Suburbs
Sustainable Melbourne
Urban Creature

Cities

SevenSixFive
The Next American City
Andrew Blum
Architecture and Morality
Bright Lights Dim Beauty
       of Chicago

Burb
City Comforts
The City Desk
City States
Cyburbia
Diamond Geezer
Forum for Urban Design
Me, My Life +
       Infrastructure

Progressive Reactionary
Rebuilding Place in the
       Urban Space

Smogr
Urban Cartography
Urban Commons
Urban Planning Research
Where

Design and Development

A Daily Dose of
        Architecture

Artect.net
Beyond Brilliance,
       Beyond Stupidity

Brand Avenue
Bricoleurbanism
CoolTown Studios
City of Sound
Curbed [LA] [SF]
Gabion
The Ground Floor
Ksmgrd
Lebbeus Woods
The Measures Taken
Megablog
New (Sub)Urbanism
Private Sector
       Development Blog

Reason Commentaries
Richard Green Sit Down Man, You're
       a Bloody Tragedy

Tropolism
Urban Planning Blog
Veritas et Venustas
Wow Flutter

Culture and Theory

2 Blowhards
Abstract Dynamics
Aesthetic Grounds
Anne Galloway
Barista
James Howard Kunstler
Junk for Code
Karrie Jacobs
Life Without Buildings
Martin Krieger
Neighbourhoods
Neighbourhoods.org
Place Space
Rodcorp
Rough Theory
The Sesquipedalist
Side Effects
Space and Culture
Strange Harvest

Environments

a456
Blog Like You Give a Damn
The Commons Blog
Environmental and
       Urban Economics

Gristmill
Impact Analysis
Jetson Green
Landscape and Urbanism
Muck and Mystery
Oikos
The Perfect City
Pruned
Web Urbanist
World Changing

Transport

cfsmtb in low
       earth orbit

Live from the Third Rail
metro(spo--ka(n')
Peter Gordon's Blog
Streets Blog
Train Blog
The Transportationist

Non Blogs

Planetizen
Planners Web
Project for Public
       Spaces

New Urbanism
American Planning
       Association

Spacing
Polar inertia
Sustainable
       Communities

Australian Policy
       Online

Cyburbia
Liveable Places
butterpaper
Australian Transport
       Discussion Board

Urban Design Forum
Urban Residue
SkyscraperCity
Environmental News
Metropolitan Transport
       Forum