Home

Book Club
Career/Education
Environment
General
Melbourne
Places
Planning
Tales of the City
Urban Design

Login

Angling for Public Transport
Russell Degnan

For what must be the third time in a month, The Age has gone all out with stories on public transport. Today's batch focus on two things: a report (not online yet) from the Metropolitan Transport Forum on public transport in Melbourne, headed up by Perth planning superstar Peter Newman that basically lays the boot into government for under-investment, poor planning, and for lagging behind other (mostly European) cities; and further articles on rail and tram network "congestion".

The cynic in me might suggest that they are only complaining about congestion because take-up in the outer suburbs has impacted on Age readers, writers and editors ability to get seats (and sometimes standing-room); but it is a welcome change from printing press releases from the business lobby about the need to subsidise their freight transport. While I don't share the sentiment from Peter Newman that it could cause Labor to lose the election -- this would entail, amongst other things, a competent opposition -- there is a groundswell of public support for three propositions:

- That having public transport is a good thing (three cheers for middle class welfare)
- That the outer suburbs don't have public transport adequate enough to be usable.
- That investment in infrastructure for public transport over freeways might be worthwhile.

It is the last that the Age is currently pushing, and indeed, that public transport advocates have been pushing for as long as anyone can remember.

It would be nice at this point to think that the best option will be chosen based on intelligent assessments of the economic, environmental and social advantages of each. If it does occur, it will be a first for transport planning in this state. This is a political bumfight, with the inner-suburban, trendy, and environmentally friendly Age, and to some extent the outer-suburban, woe-is-me, where is my handout Herald Sun on one side, and the entrenched engineering culture of the Dept. of Infrastructure and fiscal conservatism of Treasury on the other.

I fully expect some sort of policy change by Labor before the next election, but that raises two other, more interesting, problems. Firstly, this is a government with a penchant for the half-arsed, cheap solution, completely lacking in vision, and unlikely to find any within their bureaucracy or their party [1]. You can hope, but it would be a remarkable change if the end result was anything but a tightly spun ball of marginal, and largely ineffective, improvements. Secondly, unlike some people, I am not so enamored of public transport to believe it will provide a solution to all our ills. Pissing money away for political expediency is hardly the best way to achieve a decent transportation network. Transport of all types -- walking, cycling, car, tram, train, bus -- shapes the city, and people's choices. Drawing lines on a map showing a bunch of new railway lines does not count as a plan.

Update: Well that was fast. I'd have been more impressed if any of the proposals listed had been either visionary or not already announced.

[1] To quote Principal Skinner, "prove me wrong kids, prove me wrong".

Planning 5th November, 2005 11:31:20   [#] 

Comments

Angling for Public Transport
I have an interview for a new job this week in a location that will necessitate switching from PT to a car. It will be impossible to make the journey in less than 90 minutes as opposed to the 20 in the car at peak times.

"A tram can hold 140 people" - as long as those 140 people squich in tight together and are OK with close contact with strangers for 40 minutes at a time.

Isn't Flinders St station near capacity anyway? That is evident to anyone who has sat in Jollimont yards or beside the aquarium for 5,10 or 15 minutes waiting for a platform to become available. How will they integrate more lines or more services?
Bruce  5th November, 2005 22:24:53  

Flinder St.
I am not sure about Flinder St. Because it is so politicised and prone to conspiracy theories, It is wise to be wary when various agencies claim any sort of capacity constraint. Flinders St. station used to have substantially more passengers, but that was before the loop was built, and the rationalisation of the lines in the late 90s. Apparently the loop is at capacity or near to it, so some of the throughput issues might just be scheduling problems from the convergence of multiple lines and the inconsistency of running times.

A large part of the problem is we are still essentially running a suburban spoke and wheel system in a city that outgrew that model of growth about 30 years ago.
Russ  6th November, 2005 13:17:25  

Recycled leftovers...
Yeah. One reasonable-sized project, and two minor pieces of tinkering, all of which have previously been announced.
Does Peter Batchlor think we can't remember last month's press releases?
Rob Merkel  7th November, 2005 12:42:58  

Well... no
Most people don't pay much attention (which means announcing something is pretty pointless anyway). But he did fool the Age for at least one day. Plus, when the PTUA and others arc up most people just think they are whining.
Russ  7th November, 2005 13:45:36  

MTF Report
The MTF report *is* online (on the VLGA website) download Lhere. (PDF - 5MB).


Aaron Hewett  9th November, 2005 09:42:15  


Archive

December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003

Recent Comments

Optimal stop spacing and
      Russ, Tony Morton
Mode Choice and Rational
      Russ, Jason Murphy
The Gastronomic Pub Crawl
      Russ, Andrew
Monday Melbourne: CCLIV,
      Andrew
Monday Melbourne: CCXXXII
      Russ, Andrew
Monday Melbourne: CCXXXII
      Russ

Melbourne

Scribbling on Bricks
Melbourne 2030 Portal
Melbourne on Transit
Save Our Suburbs
Sustainable Melbourne
Urban Creature

Cities

SevenSixFive
The Next American City
Andrew Blum
Architecture and Morality
Bright Lights Dim Beauty
       of Chicago

Burb
City Comforts
The City Desk
City States
Cyburbia
Diamond Geezer
Forum for Urban Design
Me, My Life +
       Infrastructure

Progressive Reactionary
Rebuilding Place in the
       Urban Space

Smogr
Urban Cartography
Urban Commons
Urban Planning Research
Where

Design and Development

A Daily Dose of
        Architecture

Artect.net
Beyond Brilliance,
       Beyond Stupidity

Brand Avenue
Bricoleurbanism
CoolTown Studios
City of Sound
Curbed [LA] [SF]
Gabion
The Ground Floor
Ksmgrd
Lebbeus Woods
The Measures Taken
Megablog
New (Sub)Urbanism
Private Sector
       Development Blog

Reason Commentaries
Richard Green Sit Down Man, You're
       a Bloody Tragedy

Tropolism
Urban Planning Blog
Veritas et Venustas
Wow Flutter

Culture and Theory

2 Blowhards
Abstract Dynamics
Aesthetic Grounds
Anne Galloway
Barista
James Howard Kunstler
Junk for Code
Karrie Jacobs
Life Without Buildings
Martin Krieger
Neighbourhoods
Neighbourhoods.org
Place Space
Rodcorp
Rough Theory
The Sesquipedalist
Side Effects
Space and Culture
Strange Harvest

Environments

a456
Blog Like You Give a Damn
The Commons Blog
Environmental and
       Urban Economics

Gristmill
Impact Analysis
Jetson Green
Landscape and Urbanism
Muck and Mystery
Oikos
The Perfect City
Pruned
Web Urbanist
World Changing

Transport

cfsmtb in low
       earth orbit

Live from the Third Rail
metro(spo--ka(n')
Peter Gordon's Blog
Streets Blog
Train Blog
The Transportationist

Non Blogs

Planetizen
Planners Web
Project for Public
       Spaces

New Urbanism
American Planning
       Association

Spacing
Polar inertia
Sustainable
       Communities

Australian Policy
       Online

Cyburbia
Liveable Places
butterpaper
Australian Transport
       Discussion Board

Urban Design Forum
Urban Residue
SkyscraperCity
Environmental News
Metropolitan Transport
       Forum